`
| HOME / US / ARCHIVES 2008-2015 / ARCHIVE 2016 / CONTACT | ||
![]() |
||
Scene above: Constitution Island, where Revolutionary War forts still exist, as photographed from Trophy Point, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York WE'RE ON TWITTER, GO HERE WE'RE ON FACEBOOK, GO HERE
Please note that you can leave a comment on any of our posts at our Facebook page. Subscribers can also comment at length at our Angel's Corner Forum. Our Angel's Corner archive is here.
JANUARY 29, 2016 SHORT TAKES ON THE DRIFTING WRECKAGE – AT 11:55 P.M. ET: GREAT MOMENTS IN LEARNING – From CBS Local: PITTSBURGH (KDKA) – According to a new study, college students are spending one-fifth of their time in class on their cell phones or digital devices when they should be learning. The study was done by the College of Journalism and Mass Communications at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Researchers say the main culprit is texting. Almost nine out of 10 students reported that texting was their main diversion during class. This is not what got us to the Moon. GREAT MOMENTS IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH – From Britain's Independent: A new study by Florida State University academics Jessica Ridgway and Russell Clayton found that people who were more satisfied with their body image posted more selfies to Instagram – confidently showing off, you might say. But in turn, they reported experiencing more conflict with their romantic partner – such as jealous arguments about attention others had paid their photos online – and poorer relationship quality. So does this mean that Instagram selfies are bad for relationships? The study’s authors speculate that when one partner frequently posts attractive selfies, the other partner may feel jealous or threatened. This may lead to excessive monitoring of the other’s Instagram feed, which means they see even more of the attention the photos receive from followers, potentially winding them up still further. This could potentially lead to greater conflict, cheating, or a break-up. I wonder how much taxpayer money went into this deeply intellectual exploration of the human spirit. Just askin'. DEBATE RATINGS – From Fox: Thursday night’s Republican presidential debate on FOX News Channel scored 12.5 million viewers, making it the second-highest rated telecast in the network’s history. The debate topped all television shows -- including broadcast programs -- on Thursday night in total viewers. It also pulled in 3.5 million viewers in the advertiser-friendly demo of adults aged 25-54, according to Early Nielsen Research. The debate beat CNN and MSNBC combined in both total viewers and the 25-54 demo. Those networks aired segments of a Donald Trump rally, which was scheduled after the GOP contender withdrew from the Fox News debate. Donald Trump's acting fee just went down. January 29, 2016 Permalink
A WARNING – AT 10:09 A.M. ET: Who is working at our airports? It is a question security people worry about bigtime. And this is the reason why. From Reuters:
COMMENT: This makes you wonder how secure our airports are. Who works in them? Who looks the other way to avoid "profiling"? Who gets a job despite dubious backgrounds? All it takes is one bad guy. January 29, 2016 Permalink YIKES! – THIS IS NOT A GOOD ECONOMY – AT 9:57 A.M. ET: New economic statistics are pretty devasting, and clearly will be a drain on the Democratic candidate for president. From the Washington Examiner:
COMMENT: We seem to be in the economic doldrums, somewhere between modest improvement and the next recession. Certainly the Dems cannot brag about their "recovery," which has been going on since Obama took office. Where's the recovery? Where are the good jobs? Does Bernie know? January 29, 2016 Permalink NO CHANGE IN IRAN – AT 8:21 A.M. ET: This is real reporting, with the kind of detail we usually don't find in the mainstream media. Iran is, well, still Iran. From the great Eli Lake, at Bloomberg:
COMMENT: A little lesson from history: Ultimately, the most important thing that counts in dealing with a foreign adversary is who has the power inside the enemy country. Whether that country's people are "pro-Western" or "friendly" is of little value. The Japanese actually had a so-called "peace" government in place toward the end of World War II, but it was the Army that had the power. And it would not negotiate a peace with the Allies until the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Emperor intervened. The German people weren't necessarily anti-American in World War II. The largest immigrant population in the United States was German-American. Two of our most senior commanders in World War II – Dwight D. Eisenhower and Chester Nimitz – were German-American. But it was Hitler who had the power. The Iranian people have always, as a general rule, been friendly to the West, and to the United States. But they don't have the power, and that's what we should worry about. It's clear from Eli Lake's story that the America-hating radicals are reasserting themselves. January 29, 2016 Permalink
JANUARY 28, 2016 NO "SHORT TAKES" TONIGHT SO WE CAN REVIEW THE DEBATE: The Republicans had their final Iowa debate tonight, without Donald Trump. It was an intelligent discussion, probably the best so far. It still, though, suffered from a surplus of candidates. There were seven. Four would have been plenty. It's hard for viewers to separate opinions when there are too many candidates onstage. Jeb Bush turned in his best, most vigorous performance. He is rising in New Hampshire polls, and maybe his zest has gotten zestier. And Chris Christie turned in his best performance as well. He was able to exploit his experience as a U.S. attorney in answering questions about the war on terror. The person most observers seemed to be looking at carefully was Marco Rubio, who some believe has a shot to move up if he does well in Iowa and New Hampshire. I felt Rubio was a bit off his game in this debate. He is usually smooth and measured. But tonight he sounded, at times, nervous and jittery, speaking too quickly, trying to stuff too many points into too little time. But the points he made were solid, and showed his command of the issues. Ted Cruz. He is presumed to be the guy in second place. With Donald Trump taking a walk, Cruz got most of the arrows. He has a chance to win the Iowa caucuses on Tuesday. "Take down Ted" seemed to be the rallying cry of the other candidates. Cruz, as usual, mastered the issues. He is a man of unusual intellect, and a debater of consummate skill. He is also, however, an ideologue, and often comes off as cold, even computer-like. Mr. Warmth he is not. But he's a solid conservative, and has strong appeal within the Republican Party. The establishment, though, dislikes him intently, as he shows the party leadership almost no respect. I don't think Cruz was hurt by any of the attacks tonight, but he didn't come out stronger either. I can't say there was any clear winner, or any obvious loser. One of the big questions of the night was the impact that Donald Trump's absence would have on the debate...and on Donald Trump. I have to say that the decibel level of the debate seemed to be lower, but that may or may not have been due to Trump's absence. I don't think his ideas were particularly missed. His absence actually forced us to give more consideration to the other candidates. But how did the episode affect Trump? No one seems to know. A Frank Luntz focus group leaned toward the idea that Trump owed it to the people of Iowa to show up, but I didn't sense much palpable anger about his no-show. We'll have to wait for polls, and for the actual vote on Tuesday, to find out if Trump helped or hurt himself, or neither. It's Iowa. The Iowa caucuses often surprise us. I'm looking forward to Tuesday. January 28, 2016 Permalink
INCIDENT NEAR PARIS – AT 5:16 P.M. ET: A close one in a country that has seen too much. From London's Daily Mail:
COMMENT: Again, we note the relentlessness of the terrorists. We're seeing attacks, or attempted attacks, every week. And sooner or later one or more will get through. If there is a successful attack before the election, it can shape the outcome. January 28, 2016 Permalink FLAK FOR DONALD – AT 12:31 P.M. ET: Donald Trump's plan to put on a rally tonight to benefit wounded veterans, competing directly with the Fox-hosted Republican debate, isn't getting universal applause. It's being reported that some veterans' groups want nothing to do with a political feud. From Fox:
COMMENT: Applause. Many veterans need serious help and sound policies. They should not be used as political props. This whole episode involving tonight's debate has cheapened our politics even further. January 28, 2016 Permalink I NEVER KNEW THIS – AT 10:23 A.M. ET: A lot of whiz-bang technology around. Can it be used to rig an election? This is fascinating, I think. From, of all sources, MSNBC:
Ironically, MSNBC originally referred to Microsoft-NBC.
COMMENT: Of course, this could be paranoia on the part of the Sanders team, but I wouldn't rule out attempts, possibly involving hackers, to rig elections. And I'd look at foreign nations like Iran. January 28, 2016 Permalink THE CHAOS – AT 8:55 A.M. ET: The next Republican debate is tonight, from Iowa. There is high drama. Frontrunner Donald Trump is refusing to participate, claiming that one of the Fox News moderators, Megyn Kelly, has disrespected him. Sounds like something right out of "The Godfather." I can almost hear Ed McMahon announce, "Donny couldn't make it tonight, but sitting in..." (If you don't get that reference, please ask anyone with a Medicare card.) Trump will hold a rally, with proceeds going to Wounded Warriors, in direct competition with the debate. I don't know about you, but I'm disgusted with this. We are talking about the presidency of the United States, an office that affects the fate of hundreds of millions of people. And what have we come to? I watched CNN last night and their joy at Trump's attack on Megyn Kelly could barely be contained. One "expert" spent part of his time wondering about the impact this dispute would have on Fox's advertising rates. I kid you not. No Iran. No nuclear weapons. No faltering economy. But...Fox's advertising rates. Seems to me we need some fast growing up. This country is going down the drain, and some parts of the media seem determined to go with it. Should be an interesting debate without Trump. I have no idea how this will impact the Iowa vote on Tuesday. January 28, 2016 Permalink
|
"What you see is news. What you know is background. What you feel is opinion." "Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. " "Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain." THE ANGEL'S CORNER Part I of The Angel's Corner Part II is sent Sunday night.
SUBSCRIPTIONS Subscriptions are voluntary. They guarantee that you'll continue to have Urgent Agenda. But subscribers and donators also receive The Angel's Corner, our twice-a-week e-mailed page. Payments are secure, through PayPal. It's a good idea to set up a free PayPal account. But you can also just enter your credit card information. PayPal will probably ask you to create a username and password at the end anyway in order to save your info.
IF YOU PREFER TO DONATE AT YOUR OWN LEVEL, CLICK Donate:
DIRECT PAYMENT: WE DO TAKE CREDIT CARDS DIRECTLY. CALL US AT 914 420 1849. LEAVE A MESSAGE IF WE CAN'T ANSWER. WE'LL CALL YOU BACK. OR, SEND US AN E-MAIL BY GOING TO sendinc.com, WHICH WILL TRANSMIT YOUR INFORMATION WITH HIGH SECURITY. IT'S FREE. SEND THE E-MAIL TO service@urgentagenda.com. WE'LL NEED: 1. YOUR NAME TELL US WHETHER YOU WANT A YEAR ($48) OR SIX MONTHS ($26), OR A YEAR WITH A GIFT SUBSCRIPTION ($69). IF DONATING, TELL US THE AMOUNT. YOU'LL GET A RECEIPT E-MAILED TO YOU AS SOON AS YOUR REQUEST IS PROCESSED.
Loading
POWER LINE It's a privilege for me to have past pieces posted at Power Line. To go to Power Line, click here. To link to my Power Line pieces, go here.
CONTACT: YOU CAN E-MAIL US, AS FOLLOWS: If you have wonderful things to say about this site, if it makes you a better person, please click: If you have a general comment on anything you see here, or on anything else that's topical, please click:
SIZZLING SITES Power Line "The left needs two things to survive. It needs mediocrity, and it needs dependence. It nurtures mediocrity in the public schools and the universities. It nurtures dependence through its empire of government programs. A nation that embraces mediocrity and dependence betrays itself, and can only fade away, wondering all the time what might have been." - Urgent Agenda
LEGAL NOTICES: If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your client's copyright, we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at: Urgent Agenda Phone: 914-420-1849 In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office.
© 2016 William Katz |
|
| A | ||
| ````` | ||